Ordinary, everyday objects — that’s what most popular nicknames for buildings refer to. A gherkin, a paperclip, a typewriter, a stapler, mushrooms, milk cartons, cereal boxes, dildos… These kinds of endearing associations create a pop-cultural world parallel to Claes Oldenburg and Coosje van Bruggen‘s, whose inflated, oversized banal objects are exactly what the “untrained eye” seems to see in many buildings.
“La macchina per scrivere” (the typewriter), Rome.
|
“La grapadora” (the stapler) by MBM, Barcelona |
“De paperklip” (the paper clip) by Carel Weeber, Rotterdam.
|
“El tampax” (the tampon), by Toyo Ito, Barcelona
|
One of many “milk cartons” by IKOY, Winnipeg “El Toblerone”, Almería. Image courtesy salvemoseltoblerone.org |
and so the trained eye misses on the obvious??!!more examples: http://unusual-architecture.com/the-washing-mashine-mexico-mexico/http://unusual-architecture.com/kettle-house-texas-usa/and by far the funniest: http://unusual-architecture.com/the-basket-building-ohio-united-states/
Thanks! There are certainly lots of examples, some more literal than others. But it's the examples that don't TRY to look like something else and that have been designed in all seriousness that are, for me, the most interesting, because the nickname was never intended on the part of the architect — far from it, most likely. When the nickname comes from “below” it's much more genuine, funny and imaginative. And much less corny.
Who the hell calls Ito's tower in L'Hospitalet a “tampoon”?… never heard that -and it does not look at all like a tampoon anyway-. Are you making this up?
Medit, I don't have the mindset to make something like that up.