But is it Architecture?

The recent adjudication of Britain’s Turner Prize to some Liverpool houses regenerated through neighbourhood participation by a young collective known as Assemble speaks not only volumes about the state of contemporary art, but also about the state of contemporary architecture. For this is the first time in its history that this art prize, awarded by the Tate Gallery, goes to a work of ‘non-art’; specifically a work of architecture. But not exactly the kind of architecture that wins Pritzker Prizes, either.

Like all prizes, this one sends a message, and the message this time around couldn’t be louder and clearer: contemporary visual art has become decadent, its market excesses increasingly linked to growing problems such as inequality and privatization; largely the causes of neighbourhood degeneration everywhere. The fact that a young architectural collective has beaten out highly qualified visual artists must surely be a slap in the face to the entire art world.

But the architecture world cannot claim victory either. It has been cozying up to the art-world for too long, as epitomized by Pritzker Prize winners Herzog and de Meuron, the art world’s favorite architects. Nor is it a vote for the growing number of young ‘artist-architects’ that seek refuge within the gallery space, eschewing the notion of architecture as the design of buildings –or their modification, as is the case here– to meet the needs of ordinary people.

Architecture’s natural habitat is the street, not the gallery space. The message from this year’s Turner Prize should be heeded, above all, by architects who fancy themselves to be ‘artists’, so that architecture can perhaps begin to seek inspiration from its own discipline for once; from buildings and their occupants, from cities and their neighbourhoods, and especially from the very thing that differentiates architecture from art in the first place: use.


The Forum 2004 Building in Barcelona, by Herzog and de Meuron: a temporary exhibition hall clad with the texture and colour of an Yves Klein painting. A permanent use was eventually found for this building as a natural history museum.


About Rafael Gomez-Moriana

I am an architect, writer and educator. rafagomo.com chronicles my architectural making, writing, teaching and curating activity, while criticalista.com is an archive of my writings as well as a platform for venting personal rants and observations. I studied architecture at the University of Waterloo (Canada) and at the Berlage Institute (the Netherlands). I direct the University of Calgary’s architecture term-abroad program in Barcelona, and have previously taught in the Metropolis Masters Program in Architecture and Urban Culture, CIEE Architecture and Design program, as well as at Carleton University and the University of Manitoba.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s